Where the DRS Fits: The Case for the DRS as a Total Portfolio Solution
How the DRS’s Principles May Provide Total Portfolio Protection
When Randy Swan first developed the Defined Risk Strategy in 1997, it was designed to be a total portfolio solution. Randy started investing at an early age and tried many of the strategies available: buy-and-hold, market-timing, stock-picking, traditional diversification, etc. Those strategies did not prevent him from feeling the pain of the 1987 “Black Monday” crash or the 1990–1991 recession. It wasn’t until he started working with insurance companies while at KPMG that he struck upon the ideas that would one day become the DRS.
A successful money manager might be in business for decades. Alternatively, successful insurance companies have been around for centuries. Ultimately, an insurance company bears the risk of policy claims, and its balance sheet must be strong enough to withstand those claims when they come in. A successful insurance company must invest their assets well, be very cognizant of the probabilities of unfavorable outcomes, and generate sufficient revenue in order to stay in business. Suffice to say, a hit of 30% or more to its balance sheet could be catastrophic.
Many of those insurance principles are seen in the DRS process:
- Exposure to the equity markets is maintained via low-cost ETFs, without any attempt to outsmart the market via stock selection or market timing.
- Downside risk is mitigated via the holdings in long-term put options.
- Revenue is generated from the premium collection trades.
These three primary building blocks are complementary and seek to provide a source of returns in just about any market environment. After all, the market can do one of three things: it can go up, it can go down, or it can stay flat. The first leg of the stool, the equity component, does well when markets go up. In the second leg of the stool, the hedge gains value if the markets go down. With the third leg of the stool, if the markets stay flat and range bound in a short time horizon, the premium collection trades tend to do well.
It can be said with a high degree of certainty that in no environment will all three components positively contribute to performance. However, in any given environment, at least one, if not two, of the three components may contribute positively to the DRS.
This, of course, is by design and is a manifestation of a truly diversified strategy.
To dampen overall portfolio volatility, the individual components need to have a low or negative correlation. Historically speaking, the hedge component has been negatively correlated to both the equity position and the income trades, and the income trades have had a low correlation to the equity stake.
Over the course of its 20-year history, the DRS has seen many different market environments and events, including:
- The Long Term Capital Management bust and Russian default in 1998
- The “irrational exuberance” of the dot-com bubble
- The subsequent bursting of the dot-com bubble and the long bear market of 2000-02
- The September 11th terrorist attacks
- The 2008 market collapse, the most severe bear market since the Great Depression
- The second-longest bull market in U.S. history, starting in March 2009
- The “flash crash” of May 2010
- The debt downgrade of August 2011
- A 32.4% gain in the S&P 500 in 2013
Throughout a two-decade period that encompassed many peaks and valleys, the 100% Swan DRS Select Composite outperformed both the S&P 500 and a 60% equity/40% bond portfolio. Even though the current bull market is in its eighth year and is the second-longest bull market in U.S. history, the downside protection the DRS generated through the bear markets of 2000-02 and 2007-09 have compensated for its underperformance relative to the S&P 500 during the last several years.
Only the most optimistic and foolish investors would argue that bear markets have been banished forever.
When the next bear market does arrive, the DRS will be prepared.
All that said, we realize that most investors are unable or unwilling to invest 100% of their money with the DRS. The DRS can still perform a constructive role within a portfolio. In a previous post, we discussed how various increments of the DRS affects different portfolios. In upcoming posts, we will explore other roles the DRS can perform within a portfolio, including:
- The DRS as a core equity position
- The DRS as a distribution vehicle
- The DRS as an alternative investment
- The DRS across multiple asset classes
For more information on the Defined Risk Strategy performance, call 970.382.8901.
Marc Odo, CFA®, CAIA®, CIPM®, CFP®, Director of Investment Solutions, is responsible for helping clients and prospects gain a detailed understanding of Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy, including how it fits into an overall investment strategy. Formerly Marc was the Director of Research for 11 years at Zephyr Associates.
Swan Global Investments, LLC is a SEC registered Investment Advisor that specializes in managing money using the proprietary Defined Risk Strategy (“DRS”). SEC registration does not denote any special training or qualification conferred by the SEC. Swan Global Investments offers and manages the Defined Risk Strategy for investors including individuals, institutions and other investment advisor firms. All Swan products utilize the Swan DRS but may vary by asset class, regulatory offering type, etc. Accordingly, all Swan DRS product offerings will have different performance results and comparing results among the Swan products and composites may be of limited use. Swan claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). Any historical numbers, awards and recognitions presented are based on the performance of a (GIPS®) composite, Swan’s DRS Select Composite, which includes nonqualified discretionary accounts invested in since inception, July 1997 and are net of fees and expenses. All data used herein; including the statistical information, verification and performance reports are available upon request. The benchmarks used for the DRS Select Composite are the S&P 500 Index, which consists of approximately 500 large cap stocks often used as a proxy for the overall U.S. equity market, and a 60/40 blended composite, weighted 60% in the aforementioned S&P 500 Index and 40% in the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index. The 60/40 is rebalanced monthly. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. The index includes Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, MBS (agency fixed-rate and hybrid ARM pass-throughs), ABS and CMBS (agency and non-agency). Indexes are unmanaged and have no fees or expenses. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Swan’s investments may consist of securities which vary significantly from those in the benchmark indexes listed above and performance calculation methods may not be entirely comparable. Accordingly, comparing results shown to those of such indexes may be of limited use. The advisor’s dependence on its DRS process and judgments about the attractiveness, value and potential appreciation of particular ETFs and options in which the advisor invests or writes may prove to be incorrect and may not produce the desired results. There is no guarantee any investment or the DRS will meet its objectives. All investments involve the risk of potential investment losses as well as the potential for investment gains. Prior performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance, and investors should not assume, that future performance will be comparable to past performance. Further information is available upon request by contacting the company directly at 970.382.8901 or visit swanglobalinvestments.com. 140-SGI-052617[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]