Consistency is King, both in Sports and Investing
Consistency of returns is an important driver of overall investment results, just like in sports and other areas of our lives.
In today’s world of ‘instant everything’, investors are likely to become myopic. Combined with a tendency to chase returns, it can be difficult for many investors to keep their ‘eye on the ball’.
One could learn a lot from the intentional consistency sought after by top sports performers. You can do something once, but can you do it consistently…?
Why Investors Should Listen to Ken Griffey, Jr.
On July 24th, the greatest ballplayer I’ve ever seen was inducted in the National Baseball Hall of Fame with a record-setting 99.3% of the vote. Reflecting on his career, Ken Griffey, Jr recently said:
“On the Mariners, we had this philosophy in the clubhouse that we referred to as Baseball Gods. Maybe it was more of a superstition than a philosophy. When someone referred to Baseball Gods, we were acknowledging that this game will make you feel human really fast: Never get too high on yourself and never get too low. It was a reminder that you’re never as bad as they say you are and never as good as you think you are.”
What Griffey said about baseball can also be said about the markets: they always have a way of humbling you. It’s important to keep your head on straight when markets are either soaring or crashing.
Unfortunately, that’s easier said than done given the wild ride the markets have been on over the last decade or two. The graph below shows a breakout of annualized returns for every 3-year period between July 1997 and June 2016.
Return Distribution — A Test of Consistency
A plain English description of this distribution might be “feast or famine.” The more formal, statistical description is that this is a bi-modal distribution.
Usually a distribution will be clustered near the mean, or average result, and then gently slope off in both directions.
However, this distribution has two or maybe even three peaks (tri-modal). A large number of occurrences cluster in 10%-to-18% range, which represents a very healthy return.
In addition, there are also a large number of occurrences where the annualized three-year returns were in the -8% to -14% range. Even more interesting, while the average three-year annualized return for the S&P 500 is 5.65%, there are very few times since July 1997 that the S&P 500 was close to its average — it was typically either way above or way below.
A similar, bi-modal distribution appears when looking at long-term, ten-year annualized returns. The largest bucket representing 39.4% of the outcomes is the 6% to 8% range; a perfectly acceptable result for most investors.
Worryingly though, the second most frequent range of ten-year returns is actually negative, ranging from -2% to 0%. Combined with the -4% to -2% bucket, 22.0% of the observations in this range were “lost decades.”
Seeking a Narrow Distribution (or Consistency of Returns)
The Defined Risk Strategy was designed to mitigate the impact of these outlier events and possibly provide a smoother, more reliable, more consistent outcome. By actively hedging against bear markets, the DRS has a much smaller “left tail” of bad outcomes. Over its 19 year history the DRS has weathered the two largest bear markets since World War II: the dot-com bust of 2000–2002 and the financial crisis of 2007-09. Below we see the distribution of annualized three-year returns of the DRS compared to the S&P 500.
By hedging with long-term put options, the DRS has historically minimized the impact of those bear markets. The distribution of DRS returns is what one hopes to see — the majority of returns are clustered near the average of the distribution.
The long term returns of the Defined Risk Strategy are much more predictable. There isn’t a second peak to the distribution out in negative territory, like there is for the S&P 500.
Of course, by maintaining the hedge at all times, the DRS will lag in up markets. There will be fewer observations in the high-teens or over-20% range. However, that is a trade-off the DRS has willingly accepted. It has always been Swan’s philosophy that avoiding losses is more important than capturing all of the market’s gains.
Compared to the S&P 500, the DRS’s annualized five-year returns look very appealing. Almost two-thirds of the 169 observations occurred in the 6% to 10% range. The two most common buckets for the S&P 500 were the -2% to 0% and 0% to 2% ranges.
With a track record of 19 years, the sample size affords a healthy number of decade-long returns to analyze — 109 observations, in all. The long-term results of the DRS show a remarkable degree of consistency. Again, the value of hedging against bear market losses is easily illustrated in this chart.
Consistency of Returns Addresses Investment Timing Risk
Another secondary, finer point of these charts has to do with timing.
At Swan we are often asked, “When is the best time to buy the DRS?” If an investor’s previous market experience has been in something like the S&P 500, it is a perfectly rational question to ask.
As we have seen, over the last 19 years one could have experienced radically different results, depending upon the time frame in question. However, the DRS almost renders this question moot as the range of outcomes has been very tight, with a consistency of returns demonstrated over market cycles.
When it comes to achieving success in long-term investing, or at the highest levels of professional sports, consistency is important.
As Mr. Griffey said, it’s important not to get too high or too low.
Math Matters Series: This post is a continuation of the Math Matters blog series, designed to help investors focus on the math behind investment results and empower them to avoid emotional or and irrational decisions that can derail long-term goals. See our other posts on the power of compounding, avoiding large losses, and volatility drag.
To learn more about Swan’s DRS investment approach and how this approach has fared in the past, please contact Swan at 970–382-8901.
About the author: Marc Odo, CFA®, CAIA®, CIPM®, CFP®, Director of Investment Solutions, is responsible for helping clients and prospects gain a detailed understanding of Swan’s Defined Risk Strategy, including how it fits into an overall investment strategy. Formerly Marc was the Director of Research for 11 years at Zephyr Associates.
Cover image source: Yahoo!
Swan Global Investments, LLC is a SEC registered Investment Advisor that specializes in managing money using the proprietary Defined Risk Strategy (“DRS”). SEC registration does not denote any special training or qualification conferred by the SEC. Swan offers and manages the DRS for investors including individuals, institutions and other investment advisor firms. Any historical numbers, awards and recognitions presented are based on the performance of a (GIPS®) composite, Swan’s DRS Select Composite, which includes nonqualified discretionary accounts invested in since inception, July 1997, and are net of fees and expenses. Swan claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS®). All data used herein; including the statistical information, verification and performance reports are available upon request. The S&P 500 Index is a market cap weighted index of 500 widely held stocks often used as a proxy for the overall U.S. equity market. Indexes are unmanaged and have no fees or expenses. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Swan’s investments may consist of securities which vary significantly from those in the benchmark indexes listed above and performance calculation methods may not be entirely comparable. All Swan products utilize the Defined Risk Strategy (“DRS”), but may vary by asset class, regulatory offering type, etc. Accordingly, all Swan DRS product offerings will have different performance results, and comparing results among the Swan products and composites may be of limited use. Economic factors, market conditions, and investment strategies will affect the performance of any portfolio and there are no assurances that it will match or outperform any particular benchmark. Therefore, comparing results shown to those of such indexes may be of limited use. The adviser’s dependence on its DRS process and judgments about the attractiveness, value and potential appreciation of particular ETFs and options in which the adviser invests or writes may prove to be incorrect and may not produce the desired results. There is no guarantee any investment or the DRS will meet its objectives. All investments involve the risk of potential investment losses as well as the potential for investment gains. This analysis is not a guarantee or indication of future performance. Prior performance is not a guarantee of future results and there can be no assurance, and investors should not assume, that future performance will be comparable to past performance. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Further information is available upon request by contacting the company directly at 970.382.8901 or visit swanglobalinvestments.com. 167-SGI-071116